Comparison
Asana vs Jira
Scored side by side on project-management, using the same criteria we apply across the category.
Asana
Work management for cross-functional teams, strongest at goal and portfolio tracking.
4.4(11,200)$0 / $10.99 per user / month
Jira
The enterprise standard for issue tracking, with configurability that cuts both ways.
4.1(15,800)$0 / $8.60 per user / month
Scored side by side
Speed and UX
Asana
4.0
Jira
2.9
Workflow flexibility
Asana
4.3
Jira
5.0
Reporting depth
Asana
4.5
Jira
4.6
Integrations
Asana
4.4
Jira
4.9
Admin controls
Asana
4.2
Jira
4.8
Value for money
Asana
3.7
Jira
3.4
Asana verdict
The default for cross-functional work management when goal alignment matters more than engineering velocity.
- Best-in-class goal and portfolio linkage
- Clean interface for non-technical teams
- Strong workload and capacity views
Jira verdict
Still the right answer for large, process-heavy organisations. For teams under a hundred engineers the configurability is a cost, not a feature.
- Models any process you can define
- Deepest marketplace and integration ecosystem
- Enterprise governance and audit capability