Comparison
Jira vs monday.com Work Management
Scored side by side on project-management, using the same criteria we apply across the category.
Jira
The enterprise standard for issue tracking, with configurability that cuts both ways.
4.1(15,800)$0 / $8.60 per user / month
monday.com Work Management
Visual work operating system that non-technical teams configure without help.
4.6(13,400)$9 per user / month, 3-seat minimum
Scored side by side
Speed and UX
Jira
2.9
monday.com Work Management
4.4
Workflow flexibility
Jira
5.0
monday.com Work Management
4.5
Reporting depth
Jira
4.6
monday.com Work Management
4.1
Integrations
Jira
4.9
monday.com Work Management
4.2
Admin controls
Jira
4.8
monday.com Work Management
4.3
Value for money
Jira
3.4
monday.com Work Management
3.6
Jira verdict
Still the right answer for large, process-heavy organisations. For teams under a hundred engineers the configurability is a cost, not a feature.
- Models any process you can define
- Deepest marketplace and integration ecosystem
- Enterprise governance and audit capability
monday.com Work Management verdict
The safest pick for operational teams that will own their own configuration. Engineering teams should look at Linear or Jira.
- Most approachable configuration model in the category
- Strong visual reporting for non-technical stakeholders
- Consistent platform across work, CRM and dev products